The Nursing Shortage in America

“Nursing is walking out of the building several times a week crying or crying while they’re [nurses] in the building trying to take care of more patients than they’re able to,” says an ER Level 1 trauma nurse in New York City. She adds, “We don’t want to offer poor care, and we do our best not to. But when you have the ratios nurses are facing now, there is no way to deliver the best health care that you want.” 

“Patients are being sent home from the hospital with higher acuity and less community resources such as home health. This has resulted in higher hospital readmission rates, poor patient outcomes and lower job satisfaction for all in the health care industry,” claims another nurse from the Las Vegas area. 

From a Texas nurse, “I used to have 4-5 patients per shift. Now I regularly handle 7-8. That means less time with each patient, more room for errors, and honestly, I go home exhausted and worried I missed something important.” 

And this from a nurse in Michigan, “We’re losing experienced nurses faster than we can train new ones. When you do not have enough seasoned nurses to mentor newcomers, patient care suffers. I’ve seen new graduates thrown into situations they’re not ready for because we simply don’t have enough staff.” 

I could go on with further alarming anecdotes from the nursing profession but instead let us reinforce the above pronouncements with some data. In January 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce published Data Deep Dive: A National Nursing Crisis, which is compilation of statistics supporting the contention of a nursing shortage in the United States. Here are my summaries of some selected evidence: 

  • Anticipated demand for registered nurses (RNs) between 2022 and 2032 is 193,000 per year. However, the total number of new nurses entering the workforce for this whole decade is presumed to be 177,400. That does not satisfy even one year of demand! 
  • The unemployment rate in the nursing profession is often exceptionally low compared to the aggregate unemployment rate. Historically it is often under 1.25%. The pandemic saw an unemployment rate increase as many nurses left the profession with the rate getting as high as 1.6% in 2022. This is still low when compared to the general unemployment rate of 4.0% in January 2025. 
  • By the end of the current decade 42 of the 50 states are predicted to have nurse staffing deficiencies. At present, there is an average of nine nurses per 1000 people. 
  • As of June 2023, over half of all new nurses leave their job within their first two years. When all industries are examined the time it takes for half of new employees to leave their jobs is four years. The turnover rate among nurses exceeds most professional lines of work. 
  • There are now more Americans over the age of 65 than at any time in our history. By the end of the decade all the Baby Boomer generation will have reached retirement age. Boomer nurses are of course included in this trend with 20% of present-day nurses set to retire by 2030. 
  • Nursing pays well. Salaries for those holding degrees in nursing surpass the median annual income, which is just above $60K. For example, nurse practitioners earn well over $100K per year. Despite this good compensation we still do not have enough nurses. 

The United States is in the grip of a nursing shortage. The anecdotal and quantitative evidence is indisputable. The nursing shortage matters for one simple reason — nurses are a crucial component in our overall health care system. Without enough nurses the citizenry experiences a lower quality of life at times when many need care and support the most. Given that a healthy society cares for all its members, a scarcity of nurses is perilous. 

Nurses matter. They provide a range of services crucial for the wellbeing of those in need of medical care. The aid begins with direct patient care such as monitoring patient vital signs; administering medications, treatments, and wound care; and assisting with daily activities. But nurses supply much more benefit. They are patient advocates in that they make sure patients understand how to best heal, know their rights, and understand their options. Nurses coordinate communications among other medical providers, families, and the patients themselves. These professionals are trained in carrying out technical tasks from collecting lab samples to operating medical equipment to conducting diagnostic procedures. Nurses respond to emergencies, document interventions, and participate in a variety of specialized roles. 

Acceptable nursing levels matter also because they help to assure better patient outcomes. How is this done? Adequate nurse to patient ratios lower incidents of mortality, lessen treatment complexities, and enhance patient safety. Hospital-acquired infections, medication administered errors, and hospital readmissions are all diminished. Patient recovery times are hastened due to more thorough communications, frequent monitoring, and timely interventions. Also of note, well-staffed nursing teams mean less burnout and greater professionalism among the personnel. In short, nurses are an incredibly valuable resource. 

There are now about 3.9 million nurses in the US according to the World Health Statistics Report — and it is not enough. This is not the first time the nation has had to contend with a scarcity of frontline health care providers. From the 1930s onward we have not had enough trained professionals to care for the ill and infirmed for much of this period. The current shortfall, which began in 2012, is of the greatest concern. There exists an assortment of reasons for our present-day paucity of nurses. Let us examine some of the chief ones. 

Demographic shifts affect the nursing supply in a couple of ways. At present for example, the generation known as Baby Boomers, those born between 1946 and 1964, are requiring a proliferation of health care services. The sheer volume alone of this emerging cohort places a substantial burden on the health care labor force. The strain manifests in several ways. 

Baby Boomers are demanding more chronic condition management. With age comes increased numbers of patients presenting maladies like hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, and heart disease. The care required for these patients needs to be well regulated for the long-term. Also, geriatric, or elder care demands health care specialists who know how to address physical and cognitive declines in mobility, dementia, and osteoporosis. 

Home-based health care demands are growing. Not only are family members and private aides carrying this load, but so are nurses who are expected to visit, assess, and deliver care over a wide radius. Given the scale of the Baby Boomer generation the requests for qualified home health aides and medically trained caregivers are expected to rise. 

Another area expected to command more nurses is in assisted living, memory care, and nursing care homes all eventually leading to end-of-life care. As this generation passes away the required involvement of greater numbers of trained institutional, palliative, and hospice care providers will swell. 

In conjunction with aging Boomers is an attrition issue related to the expanding number of this generation who are retired or retiring, including many nurses. Just as the need for more nurses to support an aging demographic bulge is realized many of the current health care labor pool is aging out of their profession themselves. 

Beyond the rapidly rising patient load due to an aging population there are other factors stressing the nurse workforce. Life expectancy is increasing, and medical advancements are also keeping people alive longer. There are also increased rates of illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. And no number of superlatives can adequately describe the distress the Covid-19 pandemic put on nurses. 

While all of this is going on, there are economic burdens negatively impacting the nursing profession. Traditionally, nursing has been seen as a female profession, which unfortunately means salaries are less than many industries seen as more male. Hospital austerity measures have also led to hiring freezes and staff reductions along with increases in outpatient and home-based care settings, which together increase struggles for existing staffs. Technology can be amazing, but it can also increase workloads. Nurses now must input data into electronic medical records, for example. 

A significant impediment to sustaining a sufficient nursing workforce is the lack of adequate education and training opportunities for nurses. The shortage extends to the number of qualified instructors who are unable to meet the demand of individuals who would like to pursue a nursing degree. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing reports that for the 2022-2023 academic year alone 65,766 qualified applicants were denied entry to a nursing program due to insufficient staffing. There simply are not enough Master’s and Ph.D.-level nursing educators, dashing the hopes of many potential nurses and postponing resolution to the nursing shortage. 

Related to the shortage of qualified nursing educators is the rigor of the requirements to become a nurse. Of course, we want and should expect the best trained nurses possible, but it is worth noting that the expectations placed upon nurse trainees is significant and is discouraging for many would-be nurses. It begins with a competitive admissions process, including satisfying prerequisites, entrance exams, and interviews. 

Robust academic records are required for admission to nursing programs and high-grade point averages must be maintained to stay enrolled. Among the subject areas nursing students must study are anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, microbiology, and other related sciences.  The combination of demanding coursework and clinical rotations does not leave time for part time jobs or much leisure. 

Clinical training is not to be taken lightly. A set number of hours must be worked in a variety of settings such as hospitals, clinics, and community health centers. Students are often faced with caring for seriously ill patients during these rotations. And as with the shortages of trained nursing instructors, there is also a scarcity of clinical placement sites further compounding the problem. 

Upon completion of formal study nursing candidates must pass the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX), which is a stringent demonstration of critical thinking and decision-making skills. Preparation for the NCLEX takes months of study, comes with additional costs, and necessitates mental discipline. 

To earn a nursing degree can take from two to eight years depending on the degree being pursued. And it is not cheap to do. For example, the price of a Bachelor of Science in Nursing can range from $20,000-$40,000 at a state school with in-state tuition to $60,000-$120,000 at private institutions. Master and doctoral degree programs are similarly priced and then there are the ancillary expenses like textbooks, supplies, uniforms, clinical and lab fees, insurance, immunizations, and ongoing continuing education. Clearly pursuing a nursing degree is a considerable mental, physical, emotional, and financial commitment. 

As is evident, nursing as a profession faces some headwinds. They face long hours, contend with high patient to nurse ratios, all while struggling with physical and emotional pressures. Anyone who has worked with the public know how difficult the range of people can be. Now consider that surly segment of the population most difficult to deal with and make them even more irritable because they do not feel well. We saw that at its worst during the pandemic when many of those suffering from the virus lashed out at the nurses who were caring for them. (They should have turned their ire toward those who were spreading the virus through their behaviors and rhetoric instead.) 

Given the gravity of the nursing shortage problem a look at practical solutions is merited. Before looking at specific measures which can be taken however there is one alleged remedy that will not work. That is a reliance on market forces alone. Free enterprise has many areas of significant success in the economy and in the lives of ordinary citizens. But there are limits to what a self-regulated market can do. Turning around a predicament as vast and complex as what I have been describing requires more than just supply and demand tweaks. 

Contending with work retention issues, the obstacles facing nursing education, and issues like the discrepancy between urban job placements and the vastly underserved rural parts of the country, all while maintaining a training and regulatory environment that produces the best nurses possible, is going to involve a multifaceted approach of policy interventions, investments in training and education, and employment enhancements. 

Crafting and passing effective policy positions should play a crucial reform role. Several professional-level organizations have begun weighing in singly or jointly by putting forward proposed fixes that can be done at the legislative and industry levels. Associations such as American Nurses Association, National League for Nursing, American Association of Colleges of Nursing, National Council of State Boards of Nursing, National Nurses United, and others are putting forward recommendations to confront the problem. 

Policy suggestions often involve two parts, targeting and funding. A problem is identified, and proposals are made to mitigate or eliminate the problem. Resources are needed to promote a perceived remedy and/or to discourage a threat in production. When the attention of those in control of the purse strings can be persuaded to fund a proposal, then resolutions become more likely. Nursing shortage policy initiatives can be grouped by the following classifications: 

Resolving nursing education constraints, including increases of qualified human resources such as faculty and reducing the number of applicants being turned away from a dearth of programs is considered crucial. Clearly more educators are needed to staff more schools of nursing, which would allow for more nursing program applicants to be accepted and educated. Therefore, policies which incentivize nursing program educators with combinations of competitive salaries and attractive workplace conditions are common. 

A key area of such funding is Title VIII under the Public Health Service Act, which was legislation passed in 1944 to codify the US federal government’s response to public health policy and programs. From this act have emerged the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health, among other agencies and programs. Funding for the growth of nursing education capability comes under the authority of this act so ongoing promotion and sustainability of the Public Health Service Act is believed to be vital. 

In tandem with policy efforts to increase the flow of nurse applicants to training programs yielding high quality graduates ready to occupy the health care workforce is the strategic approach of retaining nurses for the long term once they are on the job. Contending with elevated rates of attrition by remediating factors which lead to nurse burnout and depletion of the nursing ranks is also a policy priority. Widespread unsatisfactory and insufficient working environments is seen as the prime transgressor. 

Upgrading employment terms and conditions is multidimensional. Included in the mix is minimizing nurse-to-patient ratios, limiting overtime and unreasonable workloads, and funding placements of nurses to critical shortage areas. Together with more mental health services and peer support programming psychological endurance can be boosted. Also, robust safeguards against workplace violence, including making it a felony to assault a health care worker, can protect the physical wellbeing of nurses. 

Further actions to be taken involve student loan forgiveness, increasing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements to help strengthen the wages of nurses, employer tax incentives tied to issuing of nurse bonuses, additional funding to encourage career growth through expense-free or reduced continuing education for nurses, expanded leadership training, and streamlining documentation and administrative loads via smarter electronic health record systems. 

As we all adjust to the escalation of AI into our personal and working lives it seems timely to speculate on how AI agents, the term being used to refer to artificial intelligence software interactions on the behalf of people, may benefit nurses and contribute to mending the nursing shortage problems discussed above. There are concrete ways AI agents can be useful, and we will soon see policy proposals that include AI utilization. 

There are several ways AI agents can be applied. For example, administrative workloads could be reduced by having agents handle more of the documentation requirements necessary with the use of electronic health record systems, thereby freeing up nurses to provide more direct patient care. Agents can monitor patient health indicators resulting in fewer rounds and the issuing of important alerts for when interventions are most needed. Telemedicine and remote interactions with patients can become more common reducing the number of patients on site. Also, predictive analysis can anticipate patient demands allowing management to allocate nursing resources more effectively. 

Nursing education can also be enhanced with AI agents that provide virtual reality and other enhanced simulations and tutorials to assist nursing students in understanding crucial information more efficiently. Chatbots can even provide potentially useful mental health information and suggestions for nurses experiencing early signs of burnout or fatigue. 

I would like to bring this essay to a close by examining one solution, which when applied along with the others proposed above, could have a meaningful impact alleviating the negative outcomes of this country’s nursing deficit. This requires America to look closely and more acceptingly at immigration. That a paucity of nurses exists has been made clear. What is also evident is that there are many nurses from around the world who would like to work in the United States for what is seen as enhanced compensation, more attractive working environments, and professional growth. 

The Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools, the American Association of International Healthcare Recruitment, and The National Council of State Boards of Nursing are examples of professional organizations with indicators demonstrating strong demand overseas for job placements in the US. Further evidence is revealed when noting the number of recruitment agencies that specialize in placing international nurses such as Avant Healthcare, O’Grady Peyton International, AMN Healthcare International, Health Carousel International, and Conexus MedStaff. It is also reported that online communities and social media anecdotally show this trend. 

Of course, supply and demand are only part of the story concerning whether international nursing placements in the US is viable. This nation also needs to come to terms with its anti-immigration politics if there is to be any chance of benefitting from this opportunity. The liabilities of immigration in general have been over emphasized and politicized to the point where we are rightly questioning whether the US labor force can adequately meet the economic needs of the country. Painting all immigrants as a threat is not only irresponsible, but it is immoral. It perpetuates social division and bigotry. And in the context of the nursing shortfall, a jingoistic attitude does nothing to remediate the problem. 

From the perspective of a nurse in say Philippines, or Pakistan, or Ghana, or in any number of countries with prospective talent, they are increasingly aware of the hostility Americans are showing to outsiders. If that does not discourage them from trying to come here to work, then they must contend with other hurdles, many of which are necessary, so that we can generate and sustain a high-quality workforce which after all is the main goal. A review of these conditions shows that safeguards are indeed in place to protect and support the American public with its health care needs. 

An aspiring nurse from another nation who wants to work in America must demonstrate specific proficiencies. Completion of a degree in their home country that is equivalent to a US degree as recognized by the state nursing board of the state in which the aspirant intends to work is mandatory. Home-country credentialing must also be evaluated by an appropriate US-based agency such as the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools. Additionally, for Registered Nurses the job seeker must pass the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses to work in the US along with being issued a nursing license from the state’s nursing board. 

If a would-be nurse comes from a country where English is not the primary language, then an English proficiency test must be passed such as the Test of English as a Foreign Language and/or the Occupational English Test-Nursing. Besides, some health care employers could require some amount of work experience in the nurse’s home country, possibly up to two years. 

There is also the area of meeting the requirements pertaining to immigration, visas, background checks, and health prerequisites. Usually, an international nurse must be sponsored by an employer in the US so the nurse can receive a work visa commonly known as a green card. EB-3 Visa, and H-1B Visa are common ones. Passing a criminal background check and being required to produce medical records showing good health with specific vaccinations is also demanded. 

As should be obvious, the rules and regulations are in place to carefully screen and approve immigrant nurses. As domestic professional organizations like the US Chamber of Commerce, which has co-signed a multi-industry plea for Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, try to communicate the urgency of action on this front before our law makers, US citizens should also get on board to encourage more nursing immigration to alleviate the nursing shortage. 

“Nursing is not just a career, it’s a calling. The ability to comfort, heal, and make a difference in someone’s life every day is what makes this job so fulfilling.” – Sarah, RN 

“The best part of being a nurse is seeing a patient smile after a difficult battle. Knowing I played a role in their recovery makes every challenge worth it.” – James, ICU Nurse 

“Nursing is the art of caring. It’s not just about medicine; it’s about listening, holding a hand, and bringing hope when it’s needed most.” – Maria, Pediatric Nurse 

These are the kinds of quotes Americans need to see and hear from our treasured nurses. The better this profession can be viewed and lived the greater becomes the lives of the patients, like you and me, who will eventually need the care and expertise of a great nurse. 

An Examination of Truth

Truth is such a sonorous word. It resounds with a command and a power reserved for only supreme ideas, the beliefs which are immutable and not to be doubted. We are raised in a world governed by indisputable premises such as traditional ideas of what is right and wrong. Who are we to question the values and edicts laid down by our elders, time-honored institutions, and conventions as old as civilization?

Truth carries the weight of the sacred. It provides certainty, a bedrock of assuredness, a shelter from the storm of chaos and entropy buffeting our lives. All ambiguity, indecision, and insecurity can be soothed by pinning one’s life to that which is undeniably real, Truth.

Human endeavors are based on a foundation of what we believe to be true. Whether it is the legal system, organized religion, the art guild, or any of the other grand institutional structures of custom that coordinate and guide society. The throughline is that all such human entities are operated upon principles widely accepted to be true. Indeed, expressing and acting on statements of truth is the core essence of human motivation.

Despite the zeal associated with living by what is truth, skepticism nevertheless sneaks in and brings forth hesitancy. Is there really a truth from on high or is truth nothing more than a ploy to direct one’s thoughts and behaviors? In short, it is worth pondering whether there really is a Truth with a capital “T” or should truth be relegated to a collection of common mortal concepts, including value, justification, belief, inquiry, etc.?

There are two schools of thought pertaining to the veracity of truth. (For the sake of consistency, I will now refrain from spelling truth with a capital “T”. Note, no value judgment is to be inferred by this decision.) On the one hand is the belief truth is intrinsic — unshakably steadfast and independent from outside perceptions. On the other hand is the view truth is instrumental — a malleable concept that has at most practical utility for achieving certain ends.

Intrinsic truth is woven into the fabric of the universe. Truth in this context is an expression of the essence of existence. It is divine in its radiance. It is reliably resolute. Instrumental truth is patently human. Handled like a tool, truth is wielded in service to a mission of achieving usefulness, practicality, and attainment of a desired goal. If truth is not advantageous, then it loses significance.

Examples may help to clarify the distinction between these two renditions.

Intrinsic truth, which philosophers would place as a subset of Realism, is first and foremost mind-independent. Truths in the real world are valid whether there is a thinker or perceiver or not. For example, science is replete with laws and facts describing the world and universe as it is naturally or inherently. Newton’s First Law of Motion declares that an object at rest stays at rest while an object in motion remains in motion unless impacted by an outside force. Further, water boils at 100º centigrade and freezes at 0° centigrade. These events are everywhere considered true whether or not there is an observer to see these actions.

Beyond science there are agreed upon moral truths such as not killing a defenseless person, not enslaving another, and that honesty is better than lying or deception. Indeed, our entire legal system is premised on a belief that justice and fairness is a fundamental truth applicable in all cultures and transcending all time.

An instrumental or pragmatist position of truth discounts or flatly rejects an emphasis on linking truth to metaphysical reality. The value of truth is in its expediency and the benefit it provides to people. Returning to Newtonian science, truth is determined by how scientific laws and facts can be used to foretell future materialist conduct. This predictive capability leads to innovations and novel implementations. Because scientific laws assist people in solving problems, then they are true. Truth does not derive from a manifestation of the universe.

Occasionally intrinsic and instrumental appeals for truth commingle in a sense. To illustrate, let’s take religious belief. Many people of a religious persuasion may fully accept that God is the source of all truth. If God wants something, then it must be indubitably true. However, it is possible there could be church members who embrace religious truths simply because doing so results in more purposeful and satisfying lives regardless of any divine origins or attachments.

Given the duality of truth telling, if you will, what then it the version of truth that is the most authentic? Is truth a fundamental aspect of reality or is truth more of a serviceable construct for people to utilize as they see fit?

I take an all-of-the-above position on truth. Yes, I accept the Platonic notion of a primary and primitive essence to nature in which universal truths are to be found. And I acknowledge that truth is not always as absolutist as commonly proclaimed, but rather is adaptable and compliant as human needs arise.

Philosophers refer to a Platonic conception of the universe. This invention is rooted in the claim Plato made which is that reality consists of two domains, one a fixed and pure realm of perfect forms, the other a fluid and imperfect, but sensible and tangible physical world, influenced by, but not directly mirrored by the purity and perfection of the realm of forms. Plato went further to describe the cosmos as possessing an active soul, the purpose of which is to continually model the ideal when bringing order to earthly reality as we know it.

Admittedly, to accept Plato’s vision is to buy into a reality that is determined and transcendental. Religion would call it divine or heavenly. Within this specter lies what is at heart. It is the core of all substance and experience. It is here that intrinsic truth lies. And I agree it is real. To be clear, I am far from being sufficiently aware or at all mystical to characterize in detail a complete construct of the realm of pure forms. That said, I am comfortable in believing that a monistic and aboriginal oversoul is at play in manifesting reality.

The early Greek Stoics spoke of a generative spirit, a sacred principle that governs the universe. This energy puts order to the cosmos, nature, and indeed reality itself. It is in this Stoic term logos that I look for intrinsic truth.

As much as many of us would like to reserve truth for intrinsic purposes only, we must appreciate truth is often used as a cudgel for reaching an objective. When someone speaks of the need to adhere to the truth it is reasonable for any critical thinker to question the aims of any issuer of truth’s fidelity. For the word truth can be bantered about casually, if not carelessly.

Truth, as it turns out, lies singularly in the eyes of the beholder. This use of instrumentalism is nowhere more evident than in the practice of politics. This brings me to the comedian Stephen Colbert who in 2005 coined the term “truthiness”, a clever parody of instrumental truth. Colbert recognized and mocked a disingenuous tendency practiced by politicians, political parties, and their supporters. There is a predilection to disconnect truth from evidence, facts, logic, and instead align truth with emotions, gut feelings, and idiosyncratic notions. Truth becomes what feels good, not what can be rationally confirmed. Truth becomes what one wishes truth to be, not what can be factually demonstrated.

Here in America we see truthiness on full display with the rise of right-wing populism. Donald Trump has built a brand and a rise to power by being fast and loose with the veritable truth. I for one never know when to believe him, so it is sensible to just not take him for his word at all. And I am not alone. At least half of this country knows he is a liar, but he gets elected president, twice.

This brings us to a serious fault with instrumental truth. If a society cannot agree on what is real and true, then we are a house divided indeed. The rise of misinformation, disinformation, psychological manipulation, gaslighting, fear mongering, and all the rest fractures institutions, social trust, and civility. America is deep into this dark place right now.

American Pragmatism was a philosophical movement that began in the 1870s with the writings of Charles Sanders Peirce and it continued to be intellectually influential with thinkers and writers such as William James and John Dewey well into the twentieth century until the 1940s. A hallmark of the pragmatism movement journey was in placing credence into human practicality as the grounds for meaning and truth. Philosophy among the pragmatists held value in how well it solved day to day problems encountered by ordinary people. The Platonic ideal was rejected because it was seen as too abstract and removed from commonplace life. Pragmatism underscored the utility of thought through empiricism and experience. It greatly influenced American institutions in law, education, political theory, religion, and social progress.

The pragmatist movement judged truth by how well it solved problems over time. Claims of what is true were subjected to stringent inquiry and testing to determine how well their usefulness held up long term. Examples of this include William James’s “cash value” idea, which promoted labeling a concept true if it helps to bring success. When using a map for instance one would want to know if the map shows an accurate way to a desired destination. If it does, then the information on the map is true.

John Dewey introduced the theory of “warranted assertibility”. A scientific hypothesis could be considered true if the hypothesis withstood continual experimentation and inquiry and was always shown to deliver necessary and predictable results. C.S. Peirce also emphasized rigorous analysis of truth claims and was satisfied that assertions were true if a collective consensus emerged.

The level of instrumentalism essentially applied to truth by American Pragmatism is in the American blood, so to speak. Since intrinsic truth is not empirically verifiable, even for the faithful, then a collective harmony is desired for a society to best function. We are stuck with an instrumental view of the truth whether we like it or not.

Like many things in life, truth is a paradox. It is both rock solid, but also pliable. It can point us to the marrow of existence, but also to which product we should reserve consumer loyalty to. We can try clinging to truth for stability, but find the support has too much play in it. This I know, when anyone tells me something is true I will retain a healthy dose of skepticism. Although truth is a subjective interpretation, if we can largely agree on what is true we can work and live together. If not, then we are at odds.

The Randomness and Uncertainty of Reality

Most of us grew up and were educated in a world in which classical physics ruled as the basis for understanding reality. Of course this does not mean we all took high school physics class, but the scientific cornerstone for how we think of reality has been established in traditional classical physics.

Sure, we knew quantum mechanics was a thing out there among the brainiac set, but it was too esoteric for us normal everyday people to seriously consider. After all, quantum mechanics has a well deserved reputation for being hard to understand. It is beyond rocket science. It is really far out there.

Newtonian classical physics on the other hand was relatively accessible. Attainable that is to the extent that any disciplined science like physics is approachable to average folks. Classical physics has had a way of seeping from the halls of academia to the general population in that it has formed our conventionally accepted mindset respecting the nature of reality.

And what is this outlook? It can best be described by what western philosophy calls realism. In short, realism is the view that substance or material and the things made of materials belong distinctly to a world and universe external from ourselves. Objectivity is the guiding principle. Reality is objective. It is detached from our subjective perspectives. We are merely observers to a reality that was here before we were born and will be here after we die. Or so we are led to believe.

Underpinning this objective and mind-independent notion of reality is a belief in immutable laws of nature as posited by Isaac Newton and his followers. Indeed, this is science at work. We are unquestioningly convinced by the scientific elite that a deterministic set of motions and rules sprang forth from the Big Bang which has continued to shape the universe ever since. And then to be told by them that something is a law, as in Newton’s laws of motion, says in a stern voice, “This is how IT IS, period!”

When a cause and effect interplay occurs predictably resulting in a well defined materialist or energetic action, such as a drought lowering the water level of a pond, we see it as evidence of reality demonstrating what it does naturally. To us it is common sense. However, strongly implied in this observation is that reality has a fixed and steady quality to it. Change, when it happens, is just part of the interaction of basic elements, but underneath it all exists a permanent and enduring lay of the land.

Quantum mechanics is now trickling into the common way of thinking about what is real, albeit slowly, after one hundred years of its being on the scene. The influence of quantum mechanics is becoming profound, especially regarding the way it calls into question the permanence of realism. Quantum mechanics introduces uncertainty where before there was consistency and reliability. We have come to learn that reality is probabilistic rather than assured. The universe may be unfolding as it should, but it is doing so in way that is not so easily discerned.

Indeed, it is in the area of quantum measurement where we run into ambiguity. In quantum mechanics there is a principle known as superposition, which states that the subatomic wave-particle (the basic quantum entity) abides in many different states concurrently until a measurement is attempted. Upon calculation, one of the multifarious conditions of the wave-particle is recorded. Had time or space or the means of measuring been different, then another computation could have been yielded.

In short, there is no single and invariable assessment that can be made about a wave-particle. The measurement could have been any one of many possibilities.

Superposition therefore suggests that the very practice of measuring reality at the quantum level actually creates the reality seen by the observer. Measurement no longer computes a primeval or pre-existing state of affairs. Instead measurement reveals one out of many possible views of reality. Materials it seems do not have well defined and fixed traits. Rather reality requires that an observer be present to register that reality exists, or at least one perspective of reality.

Quantum mechanics raises the possibility that how we have thought about reality may be defective. Philosophical realism has not yet reconciled itself with the superposition principle of quantum mechanics. It is hard to see how these two schools of thought will ever harmonize. What we thought was a clockwork universe governed by physical laws is now called into question.

The implications of randomness and uncertainty being fundamental aspects of reality are far-reaching. What else does this call into question? Is Truth now also erratic? Are values fickle and unstable? Will anything last in perpetuity any longer? When the very essence of reality is called into question, then so also is the world we thought we knew.

 

 

America Takes a Huge Risk

In an act of fear, malice, and desperation and with a desire to anesthetize themselves against a changing world Americans chose Donald Trump as the 47th president. Our nation’s march toward normalization of zealotry, bigotry, vileness, and deceit is now more entrenched. We are no longer Reagan’s “Shining City on a Hill”. We traded that imagery for one that is now no more than a blemish on a pillaged landscape.

Elections are usually about forging a more hopeful future. We are accustomed to expect optimism and promise following a national plebiscite. However, in the electoral debacle which just occurred it is challenging to see from where the benefits may arise. A view of the horizon now does not reveal encouragement and confidence about social enhancements to come, but rather base level confrontations, hate, anger, and retributions designed to concentrate power among an insular privileged class.

As the refashioned Republican Party has clearly taught us the rules of the game have now changed. By electing a criminal, serial liar, rapist, fraudster, and insurrectionist we essentially have given ourselves permission to believe these faults are really not so bad. Indeed, if that is what it takes to return America to a land where white, heterosexual, Christian, corporate, patriarchy is in charge, then so be it. This appears to be the consensus. Good luck America with that one! Trump is merely the means to a fanciful and illusory end of “greatness” as the nation will soon come to realize.

The opposition to this now dominant MAGA mindset will have to become more creative. The strategies, tactics, and coalitions opposing leaders will need to employ must adjust to the unethical approaches the Trump acolytes effectively exploit for their self-righteous gains. A transformed center-left/center-right partnership that imagines practical and potent counterpoints and recognizes opportunities to effectively confront the MAGA nonsense will need to emerge.

Above all, the resistance to Trump must be rooted in the principles of equality and freedom set forth in the Declaration of Independence. Trumpism has already begun to erode both of these tenets and reestablishing and reinvigorating them must be a priority of any moral and virtuous dissent. In addition, defiance against Trump and his followers must be muscular when Constitutional protections are threatened.

Also of note, exit polls show that many Trump voters held their noses as they voted for him. Reuters and CNN exit polling both had the disapproval of Trump by his own voters at 53%. Presumably they were either lifelong Republicans who just couldn’t make themselves join other Republican defectors to vote for a Democrat or they were trying to make an economic statement, due to inflation. These may be among the first to bail on Trump once they see his expected abuses of power. It is sad that they did not step up for the health of their country when they had the chance on November 5.

Speaking of inflation, Biden received the blame of course for higher consumer prices since 2021 because they occurred on his watch. This overly simplistic view did not take into account how the Covid pandemic with its supply chain disruptions, surge in demand for consumer goods, labor shortages, the Feds expansionary monetary policy, and disruptions in energy and commodity markets were instead the prime culprits. Now we have Trump promising to introduce a slew of new tariffs which are anticipated to drive up the costs of imported goods. Stay tuned.

Time will tell, but chances are quite good that the election of an illiberal and corrupt leader empowered recently by the Supreme Court and by the American electorate will prove to be disastrous for the nation in multiple ways. Perhaps I will be proven wrong. We shall see. In the meantime, let’s treat each other as good neighbors and join in protecting the defenseless and the powerless against those who would bully their way to dominance during these unprincipled times.

At present it looks as if we are in for a tough few years. If so, we asked for it and we deserve it. Just don’t blame me, I proudly voted for Kamala!

A Critique of MAGA

With five weeks to go until election day in the U.S. I am compiling some short opinion essays I prepared over the past several months challenging the legitimacy and merit of the Make America Great Again or MAGA populist movement of Donald Trump’s. This collection is dynamic and I expect more pieces to be added to this group between now and election day. I will let the individual pieces speak for themselves without any preparatory explanation.

 

The Key Fault of Trumpism

I begin with a premise. It is that freedom and equality are the two pillars of what our country was founded upon and which has for the past 247 years sustained the United States of America. I contend these two are similarly weighted fundamental values.

We hear much of the significance of freedom. We are the “Sweet Land of Liberty” and here in New Hampshire we proudly proclaim “Live Free or Die”. But what of equality?

Jefferson wrote in the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence that, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…”. And Lincoln in the Gettysburg Address, after proclaiming that we as a nation, “were conceived in liberty”, stressed that we were, “dedicated to the proposition that all men were created equal”.

It is clear to students of history that the spacious expansion of human development wrought by the Enlightenment first found a pragmatic foothold here in America. It came in the form of asserting universal freedom and equality for all Americans.

Yet here we are. The Right hugs freedom tightly and the Left declares equality matters. Trumpism, the aberration of conservatism, does not mention equality. In fact, it sees equality as a threat. This deluded movement seeks to retain the privileged position of those who historically have held wealth and power. And they have absorbed the working class to do their bidding with cynical cultural fears.

Trumpism is a grave peril to America. It seeks to rescind the democratic tradition of the United States in favor of a continued supremacy of the privileged. It does not want to share the fruits of America with those who they consider to be others. In their minds, others threaten their status, power, and wealth.

The Constitution continues to articulate and to promote the way forward for all Americans. Let us not allow a misguided and fearful faction of our population to diminish what makes America great. Trumpism must be defeated!

 

A Trump Role Model

Supporters of Trumpism in America point to Viktor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary since 2010, as an example of the kind of illiberal leader they want to see in the United States. Before rightwing conspiracy theorist Tucker Carlson was fired from Fox News, he relocated his show twice to Budapest. The U.S. Political Conservative Action Conference (CPAC) held a special event in Budapest that was opened by Orban, and he was again present at the group’s 2022 national conference in Texas. Among the MAGA crowd, Orban is a rockstar.

So, what is it like in Hungary under Orban’s rule? Most notably is the concentration of power within Orban’s government due to emergencies known as “states of danger”. Orban identifies and “manages” crises to justify ruling by decree and nullifying acts of parliament and the judiciary he doesn’t like.

For example, one group of Hungarian professionals to feel the brunt of Orban’s iron fist have been teachers. They are seeking better working conditions and salaries. He not only restricted their right to strike, but passed what is called a “revenge law”, which expands teachers’ working hours and workloads and allows the government to relocate or dismiss teachers as they see fit. Last year a protest by high school students in support of their teachers was met by police using tear gas.

In another instance, women’s reproductive rights have been increasingly limited under Orban. There is now language in the Hungarian constitution by Orban’s government “protecting the fetus from conception”. There must be only serious risk to a woman’s life or a badly damaged fetus for abortion to be allowed. In a related move, Hungary has also outlawed adoption by same sex couples.

There are many other examples of freedom restrictions and offenses against journalists, media outlets, civil society organizations, LGBT people, asylum seekers, and the Roma people.

Seems odd that a group of Americans who claim to embrace freedom would admire this kind of ruler. But they do. It makes one skeptical about what they really value. Is it power at any price, some version of cultural or religious purity, anger at growing American multiculturism, or simply the joy of sticking it to people they don’t like?

Support for Orban-styled governance is not promoting freedom. Believing an autocrat will keep their people free is completely illogical. Quite the opposite is the likely outcome. A political movement that wants to emulate Viktor Orban is not one true American patriots should accept.

 

Trumpism and Autocracy

Democracy, as we know it in the modern western world and now across the globe, is a relatively recent phenomenon historically speaking. Sure, we all grew up in what has become a traditional form of American democracy, but let’s not forgot that we are but a small number of generations to have experienced this form of governance.

More typical throughout human history have been governments that adhere to a principle of centralized control over the population. Decision making concerning the rights and welfare of the people was concentrated on a single ruler or among a small set of overlords. Wielding absolute power is justified by a selective belief that autocrats know more than the collective beliefs and wishes of the populace.

Whether we call them a monarchy, an oligarchy, an aristocracy, a theocracy, a tribe, a clan, an autocracy, or despotism there are some common attributes present when absolute power is exercised. Chief among them is a lack of accountability. Rule can be arbitrary or malicious and the people must accept it. Corruption and nepotism become common. Political opposition is suppressed. Institutions are weakened. This is how governments around the world functioned for millennia.

Until the eighteenth century that is. In the British colonies of America, a novel concept emerged among thinkers and the common people alike influenced by European Enlightenment philosophers such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and Immanuel Kant, among others. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people became the core value and message. A grand democratic experiment was underway. In time it led to the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

And now that splendid standard of rule by the people is being seriously questioned by a segment of Americans. One does not have to look far to see seemingly normal everyday Americans on camera or in writing doubting the legitimacy and continuance of democracy. More than that, they express acceptance of the notion that our country is so threatened by a host of evil forces that despotic rule is the only recourse to return America to a greatness which they feel has been lost.

The MAGA movement gives voice to those who threaten our democracy. They are willing to risk snapping us back to the discredited past of despotism. This ideology does not want to go through the messy sausage making of reconciliation and a democratic rules-based government that accepts a multitude of viewpoints. Their level of self-righteousness, insularity, and unwillingness to compromise is a shock to a system that demands we all work together in a spirit of give and take for the common good.

The degree of fear, anger, and mistrust being expressed by Trumpism is beyond reason. It is driven by raw and destructive emotion. Autocracy is a threat to our country and needs to be defeated at the ballot box before it’s too late.

 

Trumpism and Christianity

What is going on with American Christianity? I accept that the Christian church throughout American history has never been a monolithic entity or uniform congregation and it should not be viewed that way. However, the schism now occurring in the dominant faith of America is of a different nature with the ascent of Christian Nationalism.

The term Christian Nationalism has gained political currency ever since Donald Trump blundered into all our lives eight years ago. From my observation of the phenomenon, I would identify Christian Nationalism as a movement of extreme religious and cultural moralism that envisions America as a fundamentally Christian nation. In this world, the nation’s culture and institutions should reflect the principles, practices, and policies consistent with a narrow and traditional interpretation of Christian values.

Many of Trump’s supporters subscribe to Christian Nationalism. Indeed, they are a significant segment of his base. Nevertheless, I contend that fundamentalist Christianity runs a risk to its future and viability as a cultural force by aligning itself so closely to the MAGA movement. I’ll explain.

As an institution, Christianity is in decline in America, particularly among younger Americans. The Pew Research Center surveyed the number of Americans who self-identified as Christians. In 2009 the number was 77%. In 2019 the number was 65%. Additionally, the number of Americans declaring themselves as religiously unaffiliated is growing. Of the top five most secular states in the nation, New Hampshire is listed along with Vermont and Maine.

Trumpism appears to appeal more to an older demographic who yearn for what they perceive as the good old days. By associating Christian Nationalism with Trumpism one wonders, does doing so grow the ranks of Christians among the young or hasten its decline?

Furthermore, Trumpism is opposed to pluralism and promoting diversity in the country. Christian Nationalists appear to be older and whiter. When conducting an AI search (ChatGPT), which scans nearly the entirety of the internet, regarding generations and attitudes toward pluralism the results reveal that Millennials and Generation Z, “tend to hold more favorable views towards pluralism than older generations”.

I realize Trump supporters will most likely not be dissuaded from supporting their candidate. But their support may come at a heavy price. After all, aren’t there some things more valuable and worth preserving than an ethically flawed and irreligious candidate — even one who sells Bibles at $60 each.

 

Trumpism’s Lack of Decency

We have become a courser and less kind country since the rise of Trump. Like him or despise him we can all agree that we have become a divided people with signs of internal hatred much more explicit than was the case in past years. Sure, there has always been a vile underside of our society motivated to gush malice at fellow Americans deemed unworthy. But Trump and his cult of angry devotees now give permission and approval to debase our social discourse to a degree not seen for a century and a half.

The term American exceptionalism is fraught with a range of interpretations from ones exalted to ones that are xenophobic. Personally, what I see as setting America apart from most countries is our history of pluralism. We have not been a nation born from racial, tribal, or cultural homogeneity as many around the world have been. Rather, the American nation was founded upon ideas of liberty and equality that to this day offer the greatest hope for humankind.

The great challenge for maintaining a pluralistic state, a country composed of citizens from a variety of cultural, religious, and ethnic backgrounds, is of course learning how to get along and respect all others who share the nation with us. At a minimum, citizens of a pluralistic state practice debate, persuasion, and compromise to forge laws and standards which we agree to live by. What results is a dynamic churn of norms that changes with the times, but which are based on principles of fairness and civility.

Trumpism is a movement that sees pluralism and the traditions required to maintain a diverse populace as antithetical to their worldview. They want to fundamentally change America into a version of cultural purity that places some segments of the society above others. In such a civilization there is a privileged class and there are those who are not. What Trump and his followers are communicating through their mean-spirited pronouncements is that unity is not valued, only division and separateness.

Once that line has been crossed it becomes acceptable to spew whatever filth comes to mind because their cause of superiority is greater than previously revered values of mutual respect and deference. Given that a depraved and flawed man is serving as the role model for the those who want to tear down America’s bedrock principles we have ended up in this uncivil place.

Our politics in 2024 has come down to a battle between those who are willing to fight for preserving a pluralism guaranteeing freedom and equality for all and those who want to radically change our nation into one of detachment and disunity. It is a hard time to be an American. We are called upon to remain good neighbors with one another despite this intrinsic confrontation we face. Some will take the high road, and some will take the low road. Which road are you on?

 

MAGA’s Misinformation Concerning Higher Education

A common rant of the MAGA crowd is the disdain they have for higher education. In particular, they see colleges and universities as cauldrons of liberal indoctrination and brainwashing leading our young astray and contributing to the degradation of our country. (That they see Trump as a force for American restoration is ludicrous, but I digress).

Here are two comments by MAGA writers in the May 7, 2024 issue of the InterTown Record (a local rural paper from where I live in New Hampshire) that illustrate my point: “I am afraid our entire education process has been manipulated out of sight…” writes one and “Could it be that the divisive CRT (Critical Race Theory) ideology which permeates many of these organizations…” writes another. They sound very confident that they know what they are talking about. But do they?

As pointed out by John Horgan, a professor at Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey, in his recent newsletter, this alleged “wokeness” in higher education is more of a MAGA talking point than an actuality. Horgan cites Open Syllabus, a non-profit group that collects and analyzes millions of syllabi from thousands of institutions of higher education. For example, Open Syllabus analyzed 5.5 million syllabi from over 4,000 American higher education institutions. This represents the most comprehensive collection of data available to signify what topics are taught in this country’s colleges and universities.

In 2023 Open Syllabus disclosed that expressions like “critical race theory”, “structural racism”, or “transgender” showed up in a whopping 0.08% of five and a half million syllabi! That is under one usage for every 1000 syllabi. The word “race” alone appeared in 2.8% of the syllabi and “gender” in 4.7%. The rate of usage of these words has been largely stable over the past fifteen years. Alright, “climate change” has gone from appearing 0.6% in 2008 to 1.3% in 2023. Not exactly a wokeness tsunami however, is it?

What these data tell us is that this so-called woke ideology is not being as widely disseminated in college classrooms as the MAGA crowd would have us believe. It if was it would show up in this analysis of syllabi. So why is the MAGA base so convinced something that is not supported to be happening nevertheless is happening in their partisan imaginations?

One doesn’t have to look far to see that right-wing media will take an issue, true or not, and just keep hammering it to their loyal viewers repeatedly. Fox has built a brand and identity on this tactic. One would hope the $787 million settlement they had to pay for continuously broadcasting a lie about Dominion voting machines would give them pause, but perhaps not. As for the other Fox wannabees like Newsmax and OAN News, well their so deep into being propaganda outlets rather than news organizations that repeating whatever riles the Base is fair game in their non-journalistic view.

So, I guess we will just sadly keep shaking our heads when we hear our MAGA neighbors bluster about the moral corruption of American higher education but know that despite the venom behind their claims it is really just a lot of hot air.

 

Trump’s Misguided Strength

Donald Trump has successfully branded himself as a strong leader. Indeed, a common refrain from his supporters is that he projects forcefulness and toughness, characteristics necessary in confronting a nation that in the opinion of MAGA world is degenerating.

I agree strength is a key trait we should want in a leader. The question is what kind of strength? Let’s take a moment to unpack this term and see if what Trump is selling is the strength this nation needs.

Strength is not a solitary attribute with only one definition. There are different types of strengths. Examples include physical strength, mental or psychological strength, strength of character, interpersonal or social strength, intellectual strength, and spiritual strength. So, how many of these does Trump possess?

Physical strength? Other than swinging a golf club does he demonstrate any other type of physical prowess? It is hard to say he looks fit.

Mental or psychological strength? Now we are getting into comedy. In my 71 years I have never seen a presidential candidate more devoid of psychic stability. He makes Richard Nixon look ethical.

Strength of character? Uhh, no. The man demonstrates amorality on a regular basis.

Interpersonal or social strength? OK, I’ll give him this one. Even though he totally turns off at least half the country, he clearly rallies most of the other half to his side.

Intellectual strength? Ever listen to one of his 90-minute campaign rally rants? One only hears three things: insults, wild exaggerations, and lies. No, he does not show intellectual strength.

Spiritual strength? You have got to be kidding me!

Let’s contrast Trump’s brand of strength with a more comprehensive and respectable version of strength known as gallantry. To be gallant one displays qualities such as chivalry, nobility, and valor. A gallant leader is courteous and respectful to the people they serve. They are stately in appearance and are revered for their selflessness in tending to the needs of their constituency. A gallant leader does not wallow in debased behavior and rhetoric trying to prove their worth. Clearly, I am not describing Donald Trump. He is not gallant leader.

Trump plays a cartoonish version of strength that is much more bellicose bombast than credible courage. He has never been about America’s people first. He has always been about Trump first. His brand of strength leaves us weaker on the world stage and morally and economically fragile at home.

We have a choice before us this November that could not be clearer. Yes, let’s elect a strong president and let’s reject false bravado. Donald Trump’s brand of strength is not what we should settle for, and it is certainly not what we need.

 

MAGA’s Assault on Freedom

We have all seen the Revolutionary-era yellow “Don’t Tread on Me” flags being flown proudly in recent years, first by followers of the Tea Party movement and now by MAGA/Trump adherents. The presumed message being sent by these flag wavers is an impassioned belief in individual rights and limited government and a reaction against their perceived threat of socialism and centralized power in America.

What we are also seeing among these self-proclaimed patriots is a striking tendency to embrace and to promote the methods of their scorned opposition, the feared anti-libertarian communists allegedly among us who live to take away our freedoms. It is not the mythical Marxist boogeyman we need to be dreading right now, rather it is the MAGA movement’s plan to restructure America into a less free nation.

Despite all of MAGA’s pronouncements of their being a freedom movement this social and political aberration centered on their Dear Leader Trump is anything but. I could begin by mentioning how the Right’s overly liberal gun policies, which encourage placing weapons into all hands, including deranged people, takes away our right of freedom to live in a safe community. Or I could start by talking about how MAGA supports restricting women’s freedom to choose how to protect their own bodies. Or perhaps I could expound on how the Right delights in manipulating voting practices to limit the freedoms of Americans from casting ballots.

Instead, I will focus on the freedom-constraining Project 2025 manifesto prepared by the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank which has advised Republican leadership since Reagan. Project 2025 is a game plan for how to reduce American freedoms in favor of reshaping American government and consolidating even more power into a Trump presidency.

The limits on our freedoms described in Project 2025 are numerous. Some highlights include:

The freedom of government worker protections is diminished due to civil service “reforms”, which make it easier for the executive branch of government to fire career employees and replace them with MAGA sycophants.

The freedom to educate our children within a pluralistic society is curtailed when educational access and content is dictated by a narrow and intolerant political perspective.

The freedom to live on the healthiest planet possible declines when environmental regulations are abated by climate change deniers.

The freedom of LGBTQ+ citizens, who are just as American as the rest of us, is belittled in healthcare, employment, and education by a constricted viewpoint of who is worthy and who is not.

The freedom of speech is threatened by policy efforts to alter Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and other media policies.

I could go on. It is safe to say that Project 2025 limits the tradition of American governance to a perspective adhered to by a minority segment of the country’s populace. Giving this much leeway to minority opinion is unreasonable, excessive, and outrageous. We lose freedoms under this MAGA scheme. We do not gain freedoms.

Extreme socialism would also limit our individual freedoms, because such governments are run by a small band of “experts”. MAGA replicates this flaw through their my-way-or-the-highway approach to governance.

MAGA has become what it resists. It is a threat and a danger worthy of defiance. Like the flag says, “Don’t Tread on Me”.

 

American Fascism

The term fascism has entered the lexicon of American politics since the rise of Trump and with good reason. Trump’s rhetoric, especially in the last weeks of the 2024 presidential campaign, is not just hinting at fascism, he is full-on embracing it.

Perhaps a definition of fascism is in order. It is a political, social, and cultural expression of ultranationalism on the far right of the political spectrum. Its features include totalitarian power, forceful restraint of opposition, and a vigorous reordering of society and the economy. What is being described here is antithetical not only to American tradition but also to individual freedom, an alleged value of the MAGA movement.

A hallmark of fascism is its anti-immigration stance. Being xenophobic, fascists view immigrants as a risk to national identity and cultural purity justifying suppressive policies and rhetorical and sometimes violent persecution of immigrants. In a nation of immigrants, such as America, extreme nationalism can become anathema to our self-image and foundation as a people.

The MAGA crowd falls into two camps when they respond to charges that they have become a fascist movement. One reaction is to own the label by vehemently accepting it as a necessary kick in the pants that America needs. The other is an eye-rolling rebuttal that the left is overreacting and that Trump should not be taken so seriously.

The first group can be written off as hopelessly anti-democratic. However, the second cohort, which I think is the much larger of the two, deserves to be confronted for their indifferent or unconcerned attitude regarding their candidate. Let’s do so by taking a look at some of Trump’s recent statements (from among many) concerning immigration during the presidential debate, an interview, and from one of his ponderous rallies.

In September there were the claims that Haitian immigrants, who lived legally in Springfield, OH, were eating residents’ pets. This led to closed schools, bomb threats, and a plea from Republican mayor Rob Rue in response to Trump’s stated desire to visit Springfield, “should he choose to change his plans, it would convey a significant message of peace to the city of Springfield.”

On October 11 at a MAGA rally in Aurora, CO referring to Venezuelan immigrants Trump said, “We have to live with these animals, but we won’t live with them for long,” Incidentally, a person in the crowd shouted in response: “Kill them!”

At that same rally Trump pledged to “invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.” This Act authorizes the US government to capture and deport foreign nationals who are associated with countries with which the US is at war. Trump went on to refer to immigrants as, “very very very sick with highly contagious disease, and they’re let into our country to infect our country.”

On October 13 with Fox News, while speaking with the ever-fawning Maria Bartiromo, Trump warned about “the enemy from within…we have some very bad people, we have some sick people, radical left lunatics…. And it should be easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.”

To cap it off are comments from former Joint Chief of Staff General Mark Milley as recorded by Bob Woodward in his latest book. Milley, who worked directly with Trump when he was president, says Trump is “fascist to the core” and “Now I realize he’s a total fascist. He is the most dangerous person to this country.”

Fascism reared its ugly head in the United States during the 1930s and is now back for a repeat engagement. True American patriots should fully resist it unlike the faux patriots who either adopt fascism or are complicit with it occurring. The most immediate action patriotic Americans can take is to not vote for Trump on November 5. Let’s join in sending a message to Trump and the fascists among us that America will remain a democracy and that authoritarianism has no place in our country.

 

 

Idealism’s Troublesome Weakness

A fascinating philosophical school of thought posits that reality can only be determined by a mind. An observer with enough sentience to at the very least sense, and in more sophisticated instances perceive its environment, is required for any reality to exist at all according to this view. Idealism stands in stark contrast to realism, the notion that a reality prevails “out there” and does not require an observer exercising some degree of mentality in order to substantiate the existence of this reality.

This tug-of-war between idealism and realism has been among the dominant debates in philosophy for centuries. One big reason it persists is because realism seems to be consistent with common sense, at least how the western world defines reasonableness. We seem to grow up with a feeling that the world we inhabit was here before we were born and will be here after we die. Our lives may impact the world to greater or lesser degrees, but any influence we may have will pale in significance to the universe “as it is”.

When I gaze upon Mount Kearsarge, a three-thousand-foot peak near my home in New Hampshire, I am quite sure it looks similar to how other people now see it. I also believe it looked pretty much the same in the nineteenth century and will look the same after I die when my mind ceases to be a fundamental feature of what was my life. Mount Kearsarge appears to be a very concrete example of an element of objective external reality. To think otherwise stretches imagination too far.

Idealism, on the other hand, challenges the conventional wisdom of realism by telling us that there is no observer-independent reality. Without our minds how can we claim there is a universe rich in detail that has always been there, at least since the Big Bang? All of reality from salamanders to stars necessitates mental observation to behold their being. It is hard to argue against the idea that mind is core to any understanding of reality.

However, the big problem I and many others see idealism running into is the charge of solipsism. The history of philosophy does not look kindly upon solipsism. Viewed objectively, solipsism refers to the claim that our individual mind or consciousness is all we can be certain of as real. Anything outside of our own personal perceptions cannot be proven to actually exist. Note how solipsism sounds similar to if not analogous to idealism as I’ve described it. Where solipsism provokes consternation is when it is seen as justifying extreme egocentricity and self-absorption. There is a point among us humans in which self-preoccupation to the exclusion of all others is considered unhealthy.

Therefore, proponents of idealism who insist full reliance on the mind is the way to best understand reality must confront the charge that their viewpoint ignores or even rejects the legitimacy of mentality within the collective of other individuals. If it is impossible to prove that others outside of oneself exist, then social cooperation and moral behavior become unnecessary. In a solipsistic world objective reality can be disregarded and individuals can give themselves permission to indulge in pure subjectivity only. It is easy to see how such a belief can lead to many social ills.

For idealism to become more mainstream and less arcane it needs to account for the fact that a prevalent and customary reality is shared among many individuals. There is much that we individuals detect in common and simultaneously which leads us to believe there is an external world. Now if the world is truly just a cerebral phenomenon or illusion how can it be that so many recognize similar worldly features and events?

Realism does not struggle with this fundamental problem. To realists there is us and there is the external world which we grasp through our senses. But is it really that simple? Are we nothing more than stimuli prone organisms limited by our sensorial capacities, but also thankfully enhanced by an ability to reason? Perhaps.

That said, idealism suggests that we are more than augmented amoebas with brains. It hints at a grander potential we have to reveal and act within a multifaceted universe that is much more than sensual. Our minds are certainly breathtaking. Our minds, more than our eyes, are the gateways to the soul and to the essence of the universe. To still be answered though is why does my mind appear to be similar to your mind and if that is indeed the case, then what is it that binds our consciousnesses?

 

 

 

 

Tips for Escaping Career Stagnation and Finding a New Role

Guest essayist Leslie Campos of Well Parents is back with another timely career piece!

Photo by Freepik

Feeling stuck in a career can be a frustrating experience. When day-to-day work no longer brings satisfaction or a sense of progress, it might be time to explore new opportunities. Taking steps toward a career change can feel overwhelming, but with the right approach, it’s possible to transition smoothly into something more fulfilling.

Reflect and Realign Your Core Competencies

Before diving into the job market, take a moment to deeply analyze your existing skills, interests, and values. Understanding what motivates you at a fundamental level is the first step toward a rewarding career change. Reflect on what aspects of your current job you enjoy and which tasks you would rather avoid. By recognizing your strengths and preferences, you can better target career opportunities that not only utilize your skills but also ignite your passion.

Set Clear and Achievable Career Objectives

Once you have a solid understanding of your professional desires, it’s essential to define clear goals for your career transition. Determine the specific roles and industries that intrigue you, and set realistic long-term objectives. Whether you’re drawn to the creative freedom of the digital arts or the analytical rigor of financial services, having a clear vision will guide your efforts and help you stay focused on your ultimate career aspirations.

Advance Through Education

Pursuing a degree related to your career aspirations can dramatically expand your possibilities. For example, if you work in healthcare but need a change of scenery, engaging in online healthcare degree programs like a master of health administration concentrating on compliance and policy or business administration opens a variety of professional doors in the healthcare sector. The convenience of online programs enables you to balance your studies with work commitments, allowing you to upgrade your education and facilitate a stable transition.

Explore New Career Opportunities

Investigating new career fields is more than browsing job listings; it involves a comprehensive understanding of the industry’s landscape. Research the demand for various roles in your desired field, the skills required for success, and the potential for growth and advancement. This knowledge will not only help you match your skills and interests to the right job but also enable you to enter your new career with realistic expectations and a clear path forward.

Seek Guidance Through Coaching

Working with a career coach or mentor can provide invaluable support as you navigate the complexities of a career change. These professionals offer personalized advice, helping you overcome challenges and make informed decisions. A mentor who is well-established in your target field can provide insights that are not readily available through general research, enhancing your ability to successfully transition into your new career.

Cultivate Patience and Persistence

The path to a successful career change is rarely straightforward or quick. Embrace patience and maintain a persistent mindset, focusing on incremental progress and learning from any setbacks. Each step forward, no matter how small, is a part of your journey toward a more fulfilling professional life. Celebrate these milestones to stay motivated and committed to your new career path.

Consider Entry-Level Opportunities

Be prepared to step into entry-level positions, internships, or volunteer roles if necessary. These opportunities can be invaluable for gaining practical experience, building your professional network, and understanding the inner workings of your new industry from the ground up. While it might mean starting a few rungs lower on the ladder, these positions are often essential stepping stones to higher-level roles.

Changing careers is a courageous step toward aligning your professional life with your aspirations. By carefully planning your transition, seeking appropriate educational opportunities, and leveraging professional advice, you can navigate your way out of a career rut and into a role that brings you satisfaction and success. Remember, the journey might be challenging, but the rewards of pursuing a career that truly reflects your passions and abilities are immeasurable.

Discover more insightful perspectives on culture, politics, philosophy, and career development at Bill Ryan Writings.

Handling the Biggest Resume Red Flags

A long standing concern involving employment transitions is mitigating the harmful effects of any red flags on your resume. Of course, we want to accentuate positives about ourselves as potential employees on our resumes, but sometimes risky content cannot be avoided. Such possible liabilities need to be managed instead.

There are three significant red flags that often have to be managed effectively by the job seeker. These are long gaps of being unemployed, job hopping, and unplanned departures, especially from the most recent jobs. Potential employers rightly have concerns about all three of these situations and to assuage their worries during any interview or pre-selection process the job seeker needs to be prepared to respond in a favorable manner to each one.

Let’s take a look at how to manage these red flags:

Employment gaps are suspect more than they usually are these days because of the robust availability of jobs in recent years. The perception to be confronted is that there could well be a deficiency with the candidate preventing them from getting hired.

There could be valid reasons for one or more employment gaps. Perhaps you needed to be a caregiver or you were seeking training and development. In cases like these be ready to demonstrate how you have been concerned to not let your professional skills atrophy and to show ways you have stayed engaged, whether through contracting, consulting, volunteering, learning, or through some other meaningful activities.

Another route, which may be close to the truth but difficult to explain, is to disclose your scrupulousness regarding selecting employment. Your claim could be that you are so completely committed to directing your time and energy to an employer who is the best fit that sometimes it takes a long while to find the right job. You are showing that in part the gap(s) are intentional and a result of your own thoroughness and attentiveness. Done well, this approach can leave interviewers thinking you may be dedicated and steadfast.

Choosing this tactic during an interview presents an opportunity for you to explain how you see attributes contained in the job description and with the company or organization in general which align with your career goals and the demands of the employer. In other words, you are converting the interview to a negotiation and demonstrating your strength and capacity to take ownership for your decision making instead of meekly trying to explain away the employment gap.

Job hopping, or the practice of holding many relatively short term jobs over time, can leave the impression that the worker lacks commitment and stability. Is this capriciousness rooted in low quality performance, an inability to get along with colleagues and management, or a psychological eccentricity that may be a mismatch for a tightly run organization? These are negative stereotypes with serious potential to diminish your chances of getting hired.

As with employment gaps mentioned above, in order to mitigate negative opinions potential employers may have it is necessary for you to take ownership of the situation and to emphasize the positive aspects multiple jobs has provided to your value proposition. You may choose to utilize the approach mentioned above concerning your continued diligence to find the right employment fit and how difficult it has been to do so. Admitting a degree of regret may also be appropriate. However, as soon as possible reframe the conversation to mentioning the benefits you have received from these numerous experiences.

For example, consider highlighting the breadth of professional improvement you have gained due to your interactions with many different management styles and work environments. This can be further amplified when you can pinpoint specific accomplishments and performance successes you realized from across this range of employment occurrences. Attempt to leave your interviewers with the feeling that you made the best of this varied work history.

An unplanned departure from a job, especially the most recent one, can be another problematic predicament that needs to be confronted thoughtfully. It is reasonable to expect that most interviewers will think job search candidates would not voluntarily leave a position before searching for another job. Their next thoughts could very well be that the candidate was either fired or laid off or quit prematurely.

Heading off such default thoughts is obviously necessary for someone wanting to be seriously considered for a position. Here too, stressing the reality of the occurrence with transparency and in the most positive light possible should be the strategy. Chances are the unplanned departure transpired over something negative. Despite that, it is important to not dwell on any despondency or badmouth the manager who initiated the departure.

Rather, concentrate on communicating what lessons were learned and what accomplishments were obtained. Also, this may be an opportunity to point out what the most advantageous working environments are for you and how this past position did not entirely meet these standards. Again, try to keep your demeanor positive. By doing so you are demonstrating to the interview team an ability to remain upbeat even in the face of an unpleasant topic.

Giving consideration to these responses I have presented concerning resume red flags should assist you in tackling difficult subjects while enhancing your career’s future.

 

 

 

 

Develop Your Career Agility

We often hear about the virtue of agility as both a requirement to achieve business success and as a needed worker trait when navigating a career during a time of flux. Knowing how to advantageously manage change is considered smart and profitable. Many however, may wonder how exactly agility is to be practiced. Is it just a matter of adopting a new mindset or are there specific actions that need to be taken? What follows are my thoughts on agility in the context of career development for the individual worker.

Yes, mentally shifting away from habitual rigidity and unchallenged assumptions is a good place to start. It can help to adopt a heuristic such as the SMART goals model to guide and gauge your agility practice. To review, SMART is an acronym for change actions that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time bound. Bringing order and a degree of simplification to the decision-making process will improve your ability to adapt.

Beyond these beginning measures it is advisable to be aware of market, industry, and professional trends which will impact your career. These trends will be relatively temporal, so tuning in regularly to the twists and turns of work-related currents is an approach best integrated into your professional practice. To illustrate, let us examine some general contemporary proclivities in the 2024 world of work worthy of consideration when career planning.

The old career rules or conventions are changing. It has been old news for a while that rarely do workers spend their entire careers with a single employer anymore like the Boomers did. But the change does not stop there. The combination of advanced communications and analytic technology combined with a shifting ethic regarding work/life balance has disrupted the traditional relationship between employer and employee. In short, valued talent has a leg up on demanding concessions from employers yearning to keep them in-house for as long as possible.

For example, management has been getting the message that the cost burden placed on employees to work is increasingly being viewed as unacceptable. Traditionally, it has always been the responsibility of workers to absorb certain costs to remain employed, such as commuting, child care, and housing expenses. One of the consequences of the pandemic has been for workers to realize that these costs are a liability not sufficiently covered by the compensation they receive. A corresponding recognition is that productivity for many positions does not diminish when work is performed remotely.

With return to work mandates seen increasingly as an expensive and unnecessary encumbrance on employees, management is beginning to offer cost offsets such as housing subsidies, caregiver benefits, student loan assistance, and even financial literacy programs. The hope is that such initiatives will retain high quality employees.

Some employers are also becoming more agreeable to flex time arrangements. Taking extended work breaks for family reasons, delaying retirement, returning from retirement, working part time temporarily, job sharing, and other individualized deals are becoming more common. In general, management sees the need to make it simpler and more desirable for talent to stay or return from leaves.

Another trend which we have heard a lot about over the past year and a half is the onset of Artificial Intelligence and how it will both improve and devastate our jobs. AI will undoubtedly change the employment landscape in ways that practically scream for workers to be agile. I think it is safe to say that job refashioning will be a multi-year trend that is underway as we speak due to AI. One consultant who is an expert on future of work issues predicts that AI will intervene in up to 70% of text and data-laden jobs by 2025, which is up from under 10% in 2023.

Anticipating and preparing for AI’s influence in your profession would seem to be the understatement of the year. As companies and individual contributors figure our how to best leverage AI’s potential while mitigating its downsides, all of us need to find that career sweet spot between over-hyping AI’s consequences and ignoring its likely effects.

Hopefully, this gives you some practical ideas to contemplate when making career plans for an unpredictable future. Workforce disruption is likely to be significant in the near term. Exercising agility is a key component of what should be your preparedness regimen.

 

Being Valued on the Job

So here you are putting the best you have into a job you have had for several years. The compensation is decent, but not great. However, other of your work preferences are in place such as hybrid work settings, respectable collogues, manageable work volume, and most importantly you are largely able to exercise your strengths with minimal time spent on dealing with your weak areas. On balance, it is a good job, which is why you have stuck with it this long.

But as time has gone on you find yourself wondering if your bosses really care about you. You recognize that positive feedback is important to you. Confirmation of some sort is desired in order for you to continue putting your maximum effort into this endeavor. The fact that you are questioning this at all seems to be an indication something is lacking in the rapport you have with management. Yet, you just can’t put your finger on what is missing. It leaves you feeling somewhat unfulfilled with your job.

We can look at workplaces as falling into two possible camps which I will call the traditional camp and the emotive camp. The traditional workplace has an inherent expectation that employees are there to follow the direction of management — period. Employees either fit into this assumption or they don’t. It is not the job of the employee to question the instructions they are given. If they have issue with management decisions, then the the door is just over there. The message is to shut up and do your job.

The emotive camp on the other hand is characterized by a management style that believes employees need to be heard and respected. This stems from an ethic which attaches value to having the workplace be a place of learning, adaptability, and growth. This style of manager sees the incursion of contemporary business trends like globalization, technological change such as artificial intelligence, and consumers desiring personalized brand loyalty as game changing requiring employees who can function effectively in this new normal.

As an employee it is appropriate to ask yourself which of these camps is best suited for you. In some situations and for certain personality types the traditional culture may be fine. It offers a hierarchical structure with little ambiguity concerning whose place belongs to whom. However, for increasingly more employees, especially from the Millennial and Zoomer (Gen Z) generations, top-down my-way-or-the-highway supervision is unlikely to attract and retain the talent needed to meet the demands of today’s consumers.

What are some specific practices we can expect from managers in an emotive workplace? Margaret Rogers, a business consultant with a “human-centered methods” focus cites several ways. It begins with managers accepting as a priority the need to understand their employees at a more personal level than was expected in the past. The goal is to merge conditions which accentuate optimal employee performance with the needs of the organization. It is assumed each employee has career wishes aligned with related learning goals. Arranging these objectives such that company and employees both benefit can reduce turnover.

A resiliency must be worked into the decision making process of both manager and employee so that shifts can be made which satisfy fulfillment of on-the-job opportunities. Managers must have the flexibility to make good on the matches they find to bring about enhanced employee to organization interactions. As an employee, you can feel your contributions matter to the degree that you are upskilled in ways you want to be.

Integrating varied on-the-job occasions can broaden the range of skills employees develop while also expanding the talent pool from which organizations can draw as needed. Additionally, as with any high quality learning setting, superior communication among all stakeholders is required. Constant feedback, like constant data, is useful for fine-tuning the improvements all parties rightly demand.

An emotive workplace is often an organization that puts out a product or service in an always competitive marketplace. This culture realizes that by being a learning organization and sensitive to employees’ hopes they are more likely to have an employee base committed to adaptable people management.

We left you earlier wondering why your current job is leaving you feeling unaccomplished. Maybe the above analysis will help you determine where the rub may be occurring. And if you decide a change needs to happen, don’t put it off for too long. Lasting improvements are sweeter in the near term rather than indefinitely delayed.