There comes a time with all of us when we find ourselves reconsidering our career. We question why we still cling to the rationale that prompted us to settle on this career in the first place. Perhaps another bad day at work sparks doubt or your hesitation results from something deeper like a recognition of insecurity or uncertainty with the line of work you have chosen. If repeated reflections of your career role continuously point to a feeling of dissatisfaction, then it is time to act. 

The measures I am suggesting need not be sudden and radical ones like going into work tomorrow and quitting your job even though you do not have other employment lined up — although that might be an option in your case. Rather, I would like to outline a mental and emotional approach you can use to assess your situation and formulate possibilities from which future career-oriented decisions can be made. 

Unknowingly, you have already taken the first step. That is, you have acknowledged with yourself that something is wrong with your career. Stay with this insight for a while. Clarify as much as possible what is off. There could be multiple reasons behind your discontent. It will be useful for you to know as much as you can about what is not fitting. Repeating a dysfunctional pattern going forward is unhelpful and to be avoided. 

From there, attempt to visualize an ideal career position for yourself. Beware of overly restricting your imagination. Instead, allow yourself the freedom to perceive energizing possibilities in which you can express your innate talents and leverage your developing expertise. When you inevitably think about an imagined choice as, “But that is something I’ve never done before,” try to shun what might be your usual response of instant rejection and instead play with the concept as an intriguing challenge. Be open to surprising yourself. 

When brainstorming, integrate remembered examples of when you were successful. Compile your greatest hits both big and small. Look for the through line which connects these events. Is it your ability to solve stubborn problems, to be adaptive when innovation is called for, to persevere when others around you are jumping ship, to lead others even when your job title says nothing about management? There will be patterns aligned with what you are good at doing. These can be guideposts to inform you while you consider new career opportunities. 

Another avenue of thought to factor into your self-examination has to do with emerging trends. It is no secret that the world is changing. Set aside for a while your career history with its experiences and the present state of your chosen industry to forecast where your fields of interest are heading. Look for possible intersections consisting of your expertise and developing areas of growth in need of aptitude. Refreshing changes can come from leaping off your steppingstones of familiarity onto novel and steep inclines that have just enough footholds for you to master the climb. 

As fresh and exciting career potentialities take shape the time will come to assess your skillset. Are you stagnated by practicing the same tasks repeatedly? Do your imagined career possibilities call for skills you need to develop or acquire anew? Jolting yourself into expanding your capacity may prepare you for a better future but may also help you to snap you out of your current doldrums. Maybe there can even be the prospect of being able to hone new competencies while in your existing job. 

We spend way too much time with our careers to tolerate having them less than stimulating. If you are content with what you are doing, then congratulations on being part of the joyful minority. However, for the rest of you, give yourself permission to consider and act on a change to bring more purpose and fulfillment to your careers and lives. 

The demand for and expectation of workplace flexibility for employees is a construct that is not going away anytime soon, if ever. The confluence of ever-developing technological means, new generational expectations, particularly by Millennials, and pandemic-related work experiences is leaving business leadership with the challenge of meeting production goals with workforces yearning for more resiliency in how they operate on the job. This phenomenon provides individual workers like you with potential opportunities, but also possible obstacles, as you pilot your careers. 

This is a time to observe how your employers assess and manage workplace flexibility as you determine if your current employment is meeting the needs of your individual career development. 

Initially, ascertain if your employer even considers workplace flexibility a talent management issue. If not, then you will have learned a fundamental quality about your employer and should consider future employment with them accordingly.  

If, on the other hand, your employer demonstrates a willingness to engage the workforce with operational practices which attempt to satisfy both employer and employee needs in a harmonious way, then attempting to participate with management fruitfully may be warranted. 

Balance and moderation should be key features of any workplace flexibility set of policies and procedures. As many businesses realize, this is easier said than done. Flexibility practices can range from employee accommodations, such as allowing for an employee to deal with personal emergencies or other nonwork-related activities to negotiating with employees as full partners in designing an alignment that takes into consideration the interests of employers and employees. Widespread empowerment that results in optimal production and ideal proficiency throughout an organization is the primary goal. 

Practices like employee accommodation, mentioned above, and another now common routine, the always-on workplace, do offer employees adaptability compared to legacy workplaces, but have inherent risks associated with them which may be counterproductive. In accommodation scenarios, managers are in the role of giving permission to employees to take time off to satisfy an employee request, if the manager sees fit to do so. A hierarchical structure is assumed. 

Also, the workforce can become bifurcated between those who more frequently need accommodation, such as women with greater child, household, and elderly parent needs and men, who in general handle these demands less. Resentments from both groups can result. 

Problems surrounding the always-on or boundaryless workplace are now becoming well publicized. This is the type of flexibility in which workers can be engaged anywhere and at any time. Work-anytime arrangements can leave employees working longer hours and carrying more stress than if they remained in traditional on-site settings and confined to well-defined start and stop times. Employers too can be disadvantaged by an always-on model. Retaining valuable talent can be difficult when workers realize their work-life balance is too disrupted and a perception sets in that employers are over-advantaged in the flexibility configuration. 

Researchers Ellen Ernst Kossek, Patricia Gettings, and Kaumudi Misra reveal that superior workplace flexibility arrangements are achieved when employers provide structures comprised of a variety of flexibility choices, related equipment, and positive performance-management mechanisms within which employees commit to organizing how they can best work. Foundational to such an agreement is an intentional diminishment of the top-down hierarchical model to one honoring trust, power sharing, accountability, and respect for the contributions of everyone within the organization. 

Upon this groundwork can spring other necessary features, including universal flexibility for all employees; unambiguous policies and procedures regarding flexibility; better enabled employees and managers; a culture that does not discourage flexibility; and continuous measuring of outcomes with agreed upon policy alterations as needed. 

Above all, there is the need for competent leadership who can embrace workplace flexibility, effectively communicate its objectives, and practice the agility required to make the model work for all. An effective workplace flexibility reorganization can both enhance competitiveness and enliven careers. 

Following is a second career-related piece by guest essayist Leslie Campos of Well Parents. For Leslie’s first contribution to this site go to June 2021 in the archives. Enjoy!

Image via Pexels

Simple Tips for Becoming a Freelance Voice Over Artist by Leslie Campos

Most of us hear voice-over artists every day. Their voices are on advertisements, TV shows, audiobooks, radio, and many other forms of media. But did you know that most voice artists also enjoy their craft?

Though it involves reading from a script, a voice-over allows room for personality and passion, and it can lead to a fulfilling career if you approach it the right way. Of course, the right way means that you do it as professionally as possible! Today, Bill Ryan Writings outlines how to do just that.

What Is a Voice Artist?

You probably have a vague idea of what voice-over is. But do you know exactly what being a voice artist entails? Whether you want to build a full-time career or start a side gig, it’s critical to know the true meaning of voice-over. Essentially, voice-over is a production technique executed in television production, filmmaking, theater, advertisements, and so forth. Most of the time, the voice is in the background of the media.

Voice artists typically read from a script and record their work before it is included in the final product. Everything from documentaries to award presentations, from video games to movies and voice-overs are everywhere. It’s easy to see how much potential there is for a career as a voice artist.

What Are the Requirements?

You will also need to understand what will be required of voice artists. You don’t technically need a college degree or professional qualification to get your foot in the door as a freelance voice artist. Many of the world’s most respected voice artists began as amateurs with minimal equipment and worked hard to build their brand.

However, the voice-over industry is fiercely competitive, whether trying to work for a studio or yourself. The good news is that many companies — large and small — are looking for talented, dedicated voice artists. But considering the competition, seeking professional certification could help set you apart from other voice artists and help you get off to a faster start.

If you’re looking to freelance as a voice artist, you’ll eventually want your own professional in-home studio. You need the room to be both soundproof as in blocking out external noise, but also giving it an acoustic treatment by absorbing excess ambience. This will involve some cash outlay at first, but that investment may be recouped later by increasing your home’s appraisal value. With so many people working from home nowadays, a quiet room for videoconferencing is a unique selling point that makes your home that much more valuable.

You will also need specific skills to exhibit if you want to succeed in voice-over. For example, you must speak clean, meaning that you can talk for prolonged periods without clicks, glottal stops, and other mouth sounds. You also must speak clearly and pronounce each letter and phrase without hesitation, mumbling, or swallowing.

One of the most challenging skills to develop as a voice artist is consistency. And if you don’t have it, this career likely won’t work out. You must be able to speak for extended periods (and on various projects) with a similar volume, energy, tone, and articulation. Moreover, you must exhibit excellent control in your phrasing and be comfortable with cold reading.

Common Voice-Over Side Gigs

If you are not ready to start building a freelance career in voice-over, consider the many different types of side gigs you could explore. For instance, you could produce audiobooks for companies like Audible, which would be ideal if you love storytelling. You could look to online job boards like Fiverr to find clients for almost any type of voice-over work. And you can try your hand at narration and character voicing on indie video games and YouTube.

Practicing Your Craft

Finally, if you want to succeed at your career or side gig, you will need to practice as much as possible. Find voice exercises you can do each day and consider hiring a professional voice coach.

Also, regularly record yourself to evaluate how you sound and improve. And consider putting together a demo for each genre of voice-over you are interested in. This will allow you to find areas that need improvement, show others and get their feedback.

It may not be the most common career path, but becoming a voice artist can be a fun and engaging job if you prepare and practice. Keep learning about what voice-over entails, and start developing the necessary skills to position yourself for long-term success. And remember that there are plenty of side gigs to consider if you are not quite ready to forge a full-time career in voice-over.

Get ready! A novel and historic game-changer appears to be bursting onto the scene. It involves the internet’s next significant iteration known as Web3. Given the pervasiveness of the internet in business operations and in, well, life in general for most of us, it may be wise to pay attention to what Web3 is and what it may portend for our employers, customers, and our careers. 

Depending on who one talks to Web3 is either a blossoming of monetary liberation ushering in new economies and with them original products, services, and currencies or it is a high risk Wild West of over-speculation, thievery, and privacy loss. Those who see its utopian potential, claim the web will be more democratized (Oh-oh. Haven’t we heard that one before?) with critics warning against an increasingly unaccountable centralization of wealth, information, and therefore power. 

The original internet of the 1990s and very early 2000s was essentially a vast digital clearinghouse of fixed and stable documents that became available to a much wider audience than ever before. This was followed by Web 2.0, which allowed user to user interactivity, hence the development of social media, crowdsourcing, content creators left and right, and for better and worse, the web we know today. 

What makes Web3 so different is that it rests on blockchain technology. If it is known at all, blockchain is the architecture which makes cryptocurrency possible. In short, blockchain is a distributed database comprised of digital data arranged in chunks or blocks that are linked immutably to previously created blocks across multiple servers leaving a sequential record of unedited transactions. These chains of data blocks are distributed across a global computer network not controlled by any corporations, but only by individual users or their techie proxies, known as miners, rendering the blockchain decentralized, secure, and trusted. Or so we are being told. 

What is paradigm shifting about this model is that data transactions supersede governments, corporate business, or any legal centralizing organization. Crypto has given us an opportunity to imagine and experience non-governmental currencies. The time is now here to speculate about how this standard can be applied to other products and services. 

One area growing in popularity involves the generation of communities of users who share the value of a commodity of some sort. Blockchain enables the use of non-fungible tokens or NFTs, which are digital units of ownership. These NFTs can be used to purchase, exchange, or trade in art, media, gaming premiums, or any set of items, physical or not, which are deemed valuable by the members of an esoteric community.  

With all communication and transactions encrypted real-world identities are hidden. One is known only by their code. Allegedly, one does not have to know or trust others in the community to conduct transactions with them. The rules of the game are so hard-wired into the technology, security is assured. 

Entrepreneurs are already starting to have a field day with this paradigm. Yuga Labs launched the Bored Ape Yacht Club in 2021. It is an NFT collection utilizing an open source blockchain. The commodity of value, believe or not, is a set of algorithmic generated ape cartoon profiles, which when owned, can be used for creating art or media projects. Sales this year have totaled $1B. You don’t get it? Either do I. 

Established companies are starting to see that something is going on here. Microsoft and others are accepting cryptocurrencies as payment. Nike and others are encouraging collector communities using their brands. The concept of alternative virtual worlds with their own economies and players is catching on. Careers will be formed here that old schoolers like me cannot at all imagine. 

How much of Web3 is hype vs. hope has yet to be seen. It seems that some kind of Brave New World is always just around the corner now that the future is here to stay. 

To be successful in nearly every career, especially those careers requiring interactions with people, and that is a lot of them, you will be placed in a position of needing to persuade others to do something you think is valuable. Guiding direct reports to perform optimally, making a sale to prospective customers, swaying the direction and momentum of a field of expertise, or convincing co-workers to shift tactically are common examples when becoming an influencer is necessary. Whether or not you are a boss, being persuasive makes you a leader to some degree. 

A common misconception is that those who practice persuasion best are of a special class of personality types born with a gift for inducing the masses to do what they want done. We think they are the only ones who can grab the attention, shape the decisions, and erase the doubts of others leading to results envisioned by the persuaders. Oh, if only we could be like them, then we could reach such heights in our careers! 

In a still pertinent twenty-year-old article by University of Arizona psychologist and author Robert B. Cialdini, he unpacks research-based fundamentals underpinning the science of persuasion. He further illustrates how practical applications can be derived from these principles allowing even the most unconvincing of us to hone our influencing abilities. 

What strikes me most about Cialdini’s suggestions is how rooted they are in interpersonal skills. Soft skills are often considered the awkward stepchild of the hard technical aptitudes that form the bases of many careers. As derided as soft skills often are, mastering them can make a worker and a leader extremely effective, and well… persuasive. 

Cialdini identifies six tenets foundational to persuasion, beginning with the deceptively simple idea that people will better respect someone who is seen as more or less equivalent to themselves. If you are a boss this may mean utilizing the peers of direct reports who share your vision and can help you to spread the perception throughout the department or organization. 

If this sounds too manipulative, note that other persuasion principles involve ensuring that you as a leader are well liked and that you treat others the way you would like to be treated. We tend to be persuaded by people who show they like us and are kind to us. So, establishing bonds of familiarity and mutual admiration by leaders can help to make the rest of us more impressionable. 

The remaining standards of persuasion are more specialized and a little less soft, but still rooted in respect. For example, in trying to ensure compliance and commitment from among those being persuaded it is necessary for them to conform to your perspective voluntarily and not by way of coercion. If those being persuaded can be demonstrable in their acceptance by displaying their agreement, say in writing, then all the better. 

Another key aspect of being an effective advisor is also being a credible expert in your field. Many of us still do find plausibility in the vision and words which come from true professionals. To be taken seriously, it is necessary to lay the groundwork ahead of time to establish yourself as someone who knows what they are talking about. 

According to Cialdini, research also reveals that people are more persuadable if the information they are being given is considered scarce or exclusive. Rareness and sparsity make commodities and information more valuable and desirable, setting us up for an openness and willingness to behave in ways which we hope will secure them. If we are delivered a scoop or select information, then we are more likely to believe it. 

Being an agent of influence need not be reserved for only those born with a special talent. We can all practice accessible skills of persuasion by understanding a few essential details. Among the most important of them is to be the change you want to see in others. 

As has been widely reported over the past couple of years, workplaces, particularly in the knowledge economy, have either undergone or are being pressured to add flexibility features to their operations. The combination of Covid-related adjustments and technical innovations has resulted in a reassessment of what productivity and by extension appropriate workplace agency looks like in the modern workplace. 

A 2021 Ipsos survey revealed that globally 30% of workers would attempt to leave their jobs if required to return to the pre-pandemic office setting. Many of the ever-plugged-in younger cohort of workers see only an upside to having jobs with flextime. Benefits such as managing the complex demands of modern living, taking care of children and elderly parents, reducing commuting time, and functioning when one is most energetic and constructive during the day are among the advantages cited as desirable with pliable scheduling and task requirements. 

Flextime features are now much more present in recruiting job descriptions. Some of this is undoubtedly because of the increased demand for flexibility from a workforce that seems to be sorting itself into those oriented toward results-only vs. traditional workplaces, but also due to the uncertainty of the future. Covid has not completely gone away and with further environmental changes said to be coming from climate change, who knows what is next? Disruption is at least as likely as stability when planning operationally. 

However, workplace changes of the sort being described here need to be assessed and designed thoughtfully. It can be easy to dump on traditional workplaces as having rigid, arbitrary, and ineffectual routines, like for example, habitually scheduled staff meetings laden with fill-in blah, blah, blah. Yet, as resiliency transformations occur it can be useful to see not only what is gained, but also what is lost by such modifications. 

A case could be made that as customary practices dissolve not all the consequences may be necessarily positive. Of key importance is what it means to be professional. Parameters were established over time to separate work life from non-work life. We got used to sliding in and out of work modes with a regularity that brought predictability, certainty, and some semblance of balance. 

One negative element of blurring the distinction between work and leisure time is the always “being on” phenomenon. When flitting in and out of work mode multiple times per day, including answering supervisor emails at 8:30 pm and being ready to respond to the Amsterdam office at 6:30 am, cumulative work time can approach 10-12 hours. It begs the question of who benefits. Probably not the worker. 

Also, professional norms and protocols used in performance reviews and advancement decisions have been based on an in-person work context. Are the expected actions of workers who work from home holding up fairly to legacy achievement standards? Managers still wedded to the notion that time on task always equals productivity may be less inclined to favorably view fragmented work as effective, even if the results are of similar quality or perhaps even better than before. 

This can be especially problematic for new hires onboarded with a company practicing flextime. How well can management really get to know their direct reports when they are working remotely? Perhaps fine — or perhaps not. New workers are motivated to do well at their new jobs and are trying to navigate expectations and learn company culture digitally. Might they be ripe for various types of exploitation, such as working exceptionally long hours or having to face other unreasonable demands from management or co-workers in a flextime environment? The possibility is certainly there. 

Decentralization does have its benefits. But it also could have liabilities. As we redefine what it means to be professional in a flextime world, we need to be mindful of how to achieve efficiency in a way that rewards both management and front-line workers. This challenge is a subset of organizational agility and a crucial one going forward. 

Career prospects for women during the economy of the past couple of years show significant disillusionment. By the end of 2020, 140,000 jobs in the U.S. which had been held by women were lost in female-dominant industries like education, hospitality, and retail according to Business Insider. The National Women’s Law Center reported in 2021 that about two-thirds of all minimum wage jobs are held by women. Unemployment rates remain high for women of color and women with disabilities. 

The past years have also not been encouraging for professional women seeking to secure leadership positions, particularly in highly capitalized businesses. Julia Boorstin of CNBC reported in 2020 that of the 500 largest American companies only 6% of CEOs were women. Not only that, but there is this occurrence of women being placed in CEO positions of troubled companies struggling to hang on. The phenomenon is known as the “Glass Cliff” problem. If the ship cannot be quickly righted to profitability, then it can be easier for some to say how a woman was given a chance to show leadership, but it just did not work out. 

McKinsey reveals another stunning circumstance. The proportion of women in jobs declines as the amount of responsibility embedded within these jobs increases. Women make up 50.8% of the American population, but account for 47% of entry-level positions, 38% of management assignments, and 33% of senior management occupations. For every 100 men who move into management roles, there are 85 women who do so. 

The history of women in the workforce facing discrimination, unequal pay, and harassment in one form or another is a painfully long one. However, there are some other statistics which curiously suggest more positive changes may be coming for women in the workforce. 

The writer David French points to some recent education stats showing men are slipping in acquiring the schooling necessary to stay highly qualified and competitive for the good jobs, and for leadership roles particularly. For example, at the end of the 2020-2021 college academic year women comprised 59.5% of the overall student body, the highest ever, and men only 40.5%. This data is from the National Student Clearinghouse, a nonprofit research group. 

Furthermore, the 2020-2021 school year showed a decline of 1.5 million students relative to five years earlier. 71% of that drop was in men leaving U.S. colleges and universities! For a reason I cannot explain, men’s attendance has fallen such that they have become a minority cohort in higher education. Can a drop in men’s career prospects relative to women, including in leadership, be far behind? 

One does not have to look far to notice an unmistakable correlation between levels of education and career success. Acquisition of knowledge, skill, experience, contacts, and confidence are all derived from furthering one’s education. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics most recent data concerning earnings and unemployment rates by educational attainment show median weekly earnings for those holding only a high school diploma to be $781, but with an unemployment rate of 9%. The bachelor’s degree college graduate in comparison earns on average $1305 per week with an unemployment rate of 5.5%. 

To be sure, the traditional four-year college degree program model is under serious review, as it should be, by those who foot the high cost. More targeted and lower cost education and credentialing options are providing increasing competition to legacy college and university programs. That’s fine. But if men think the good jobs and leadership positions will always be waiting for them as in the past, while women are actively preparing to compete and hold those occupations for themselves at rates superior to males, then men may be in for a rude awakening soon. 

As women gain more of the good jobs and leadership roles, they are likely to open more doors for other women to participate more fully in quality education and work opportunities. As education attainment shifts more to women, so too will their employment and leadership strength. 

An odd convention has fixed itself into the career psyche. It involves widespread practice that when a worker has demonstrated specialized competency and efficiency over a period of time, then the next step in that person’s career must naturally be an elevation to a management position. A causation is assumed linking proficient performance with an ability to lead direct reports. 

This assumption may be oversold, resulting in the selection of many managers who find themselves unhappy and detached from what they do best. 

Surely, there are many cases when a stellar individual contributor turns out to be an excellent manager of workers who does what they once did. As managers, they know intimately the challenges their subordinates face and having been skilled in addressing them formerly they can guide teams with heightened awareness and credibility. A once knowledgeable and experienced provider, who is also an inspiring leader, is a great combination indeed. 

Unfortunately, there are times when the “advancement” of a well-versed individual contributor to management is misplaced. During these pandemic times, it is no secret that many workers are reassessing their roles. This includes managers. It is not uncommon for some managers to feel a nostalgia for work that was more purposeful and fulfilling compared to being supervisory. They remember the satisfaction they felt at being an excellent contributor, and with reflection, may realize they like that better than being a boss. 

However, we are ingrained to think hierarchal. Once we have moved up, it is considered a disgrace to move back down. What will people think if I give up this management post and return to a job I once had? That will be seen as a demotion, right?  

Thoughts like these would discourage many managers from reversing course. If the future of one’s career is a choice between continuing in a less than satisfying management role or risking possible shame by returning to a former position, then one is very likely to feel stuck. This is not a good place to be. 

One thing helping with such a conundrum is the fresh post-pandemic attitude allowing for workers to search for more meaning in their work. Just as there is now more evidence of hiring managers being more accepting of job-hopping over the past two years when they look at resumes, there may now be greater acknowledgment of managers leaving to search for greener pastures. 

Reframing your traditional ideas about hierarchy may also help. Get out ahead of any perceived criticism or doubt from others by publicly admitting that returning to a role, which again makes possible more autonomy and the practice of mastery, is a better fit for yourself than management. It is possible to state that your career and the organization can both profit from such a move. This can be communicated in a way which is both believable and face-saving. 

Leadership, as well, can be viewed with old-fashioned limitations. Management jobs need not be the only way to lead. An individual contributor who trains and mentors colleagues through sharing of expertise and proven methodologies can have a greater leadership impact than someone who is overly consumed with analyzing productivity metrics of direct reports. By claiming you prefer to lead more by guidance and coaching than the old management job allowed for, it can help to substantiate your re-entry move. 

Then there is the possibility of retaining your management position on the hierarchy by proposing a new strategic venture that better incorporates both your individual contributor and management values. From your perch within the organization, you may be able to see more creative ways of approaching potential opportunities, which call for just the right fusion of skills you can provide. 

Greater agility does not just benefit organizations, it enhances careers as well. If you are questioning your contributions due to limitations placed on you by being a manager, the time may be right for a change. 

As a people, we habitually want to return to normal after a sudden disruption. To seek stable ground after a storm is what we are hard-wired to do. The pent-up desire to reclaim regularity throughout this pandemic is palpable. We want so much to snap back to a 2019-era lifestyle that it may be hindering our capacity to plan for what increasingly looks like an uncertain future. 

A combination of Covid’s aversion to disappearing and more general workforce changes promote doubtfulness in the minds of many about future economic, and by extension, career directions. Questions as basic as, will my job be permanently home-based and remote, or will my job, which is centered on being face-to-face with many people, forever now to be risky? These are existential questions. 

Career resilience, or the ability to navigate one’s professional life through the turbulent vicissitudes of the 21st century employment environment, is not a new topic. Remaining nimble and adept enough to reapply one’s skillset to changing situations has been advised by career professionals for years now. Of course, such advice has most often been given in the context of technological automation and cross-market globalization. 

The unsettled world of Covid, however, only adds to the urgency. Emerging variants of the virus and the patchwork way nations and regions respond to the emergency leaves Covid-fatigued people feeling discouraged that we can get past this anytime soon. Optimism rises and fades like the graphs of infection rates. As far and as wide as we can see, the economy is being buffeted by winds of Covid-generated incertitude. Career resilience becomes but a subset to the larger challenging phenomenon of economic resilience. 

The National Association of Counties identifies economic resilience as, “a community’s ability to foresee, adapt to, and leverage changing conditions to their advantage”. The U.S. Department of Commerce is more blunt in its description. Commerce questions an entity’s proficiency to endure and to rally from a severe disruption, and its ability to avoid crises in the first place. The take-away inference is that acceptance of the proverbial new normal and requisite mitigation planning is to be standard operation. 

The interests of non-entrepreneurial workers are served when employees understand the sustainability planning and related past practices of the employers for whom they work or want to work. If an employer is overly relying on luck to get them through or is in denial about change occurring, these should be warning signs. Do not let the miscalculations of others derail your career. 

What we want to see instead are signs of employers envisioning and assessing risks to their markets and assets. These are sometimes known as steady-state actions. From there they should be prepared to deploy a response strategy when crisis strikes.  

Included in this overall approach can be interventions such as sustainability budget planning; diversification efforts to reduce exposure to high risk sectors; gardening of workforces which will ride out disruptions and not quickly bail; alignments with business, government, and educational resources to keep forecasting and preparedness skills sharp and ready; and agile management capable of shifting available talent to meet unexpected needs effectively. 

Continuity planning for an organization or an individual share certain processes. Key among them is to know the weak areas. Where are the shortcomings? How can they be managed or strengthened? Which metrics apply to indicate success is being achieved? 

Another key process is in knowing the threat indicators early on. Take advantage of utilizing a natural or trained inclination to be preventative and farsighted. 

Above all, establish systems, procedures, and habits, which have resiliency built into them. Facing turmoil requires a degree of fortitude. Until Covid is somehow controlled worldwide the economic and career challenges related to the virus will continue. Confronting the menace clear-eyed and purposeful is a potent response. 

An unmistakably big story in the 2021 career space has been about what is being dubbed “The Great Resignation” or “Turnover Tsunami”. Of course, I am referring to the throngs of workers in both the relatively high paying knowledge economy, but also in the lower income sectors, like hospitality and retail, who are leaving or not returning to their pre-pandemic fields of employment. 

A whopping 40% of the global workforce has left or is planning to leave jobs this year. The U.S. Labor Department has never seen such an acute spike in resignations in the twenty plus years it has been tracking such statistics. 

The popular media has for months now been pumping out pieces referring to the phenomenon and the suspected reasons behind it, such as higher savings rates thanks to government financial assistance, fear of catching the virus at work, insufficient childcare options for working parents, and a growing realization that a lot of hiring is now going on.  

However, the monumental reason for this employment churn appears to be a dignity factor. The Covid pandemic is allowing for a massive reassessment, and by extension, a realignment of what truly matters in one’s work and life. 

Shelter-in-place directives, social distancing, and closed office buildings, restaurants, and stores shook people’s mindsets in numerous ways. Many front-line “essential” workers who were heralded as heroes early in the pandemic are now either burnt out or tired of the abuse they get, like healthcare workers. Many well compensated workers ensconced in jobs pertaining to information flows and the means of production are bailing from positions because of the stress levels and long hours. Those on the low socioeconomic end feel abused, disrespected, and exploited and are not going to take it anymore. The number of workers and the type of worker taking the employment shift plunge are both expanding. 

This spectacle is causing economic hardships for a range of stakeholders from business owners to customers. The flux in employment is helping to fuel in part the larger pandemic-related worldwide economic convulsion. Shouldn’t we all be really concerned about this dramatic and disruptive turn of events?  

Yes, we should be, but not of fear for the interests of the wealth holders becoming suddenly inconvenienced, but in support of workers who are all in different sounding ways and from different points of view collectively saying they want and expect fair compensation, respect, and a voice in how their careers are going to develop. This brief period in history may be seen as a possible inflection point in the 21st century morphing of work and career into something different from the way it has been in the past. 

I come back to the three intrinsic motivators for professional workers eloquently described by Daniel Pink about ten years ago. Pink wrote and spoke about the need and quest for autonomy, mastery, and purpose as to what gets successful and satisfied workers out of bed in the morning. We are more motivated and driven to perform well at our jobs when we feel we have relatively free rein to innovate and produce, when we feel we are developing a skill or talent, and when we feel that what we are doing at work matters in a value sense. 

It seems to me that what many of these job searchers are looking for comes very close to what Pink is describing. Combine dignified levels of compensation with workplace cultures that honor worker autonomy, mastery, and purpose and a job can become more satisfying and sustainable. 

I get that some just want a decent job and not a career, but what makes an employee want to stay and thrive is fundamentally not very different between a highly educated contributor and an hourly employee. Dignity and respect can go a long way.